5 Ways To Play The Forest on Mac – Our Experience
How to Play The Forest on Mac
If you want to play The Forest on Mac, you should know that this comes with its own set of challenges, mainly because there’s no native macOS version. But fear not, as we’ve tinkered with some cool workarounds to find the best way to enjoy this survival horror game on your Apple machine. In fact, our team did the heavy research, ran tests, and evaluated each method with benchmarks and personal experience to guide you on your Mac gaming journey.
The Forest Mac Methods and Instructions
In the following section, we’ve explained the instructions for the methods we’ve found that work for playing The Forest on Mac.
Boosteroid Cloud Gaming (Recommended method)
CrossOver + the Game Porting Toolkit
The results from our tests with The Forest on Mac
The Forest on Mac with Boosteroid
Our experience with Boosteroid was notably positive. On a stable internet connection of 50 Mbps, we achieved consistent frame rates of around 60 FPS on high settings, with occasional dips during highly detailed scenes. What stood out with this method was the lack of need for downloads or installations, which allowed us to play directly through our browser.
The Forest Mac Experience with GeForce Now
GeForce Now delivered The Forest on Mac with crisp graphics and we experienced frame rates similar to those that we got on Boosteroid, hovering around 60 FPS on high settings with our Mac connected to a 50 Mbps line. However, the initial download and installation of the GeForce Now client were additional steps we had to consider. The main hiccup was the waiting time on the free tier, hence, we recommend considering the premium subscription for immediate access, especially for a game like The Forest where immersion is key.
Can you play The Forest on Mac with Parallels?
Our experience with Parallels Desktop on an M1 MacBook Air was surprisingly smooth. We didn’t expect the game to run well in a virtualized environment, but Parallels has come a long way. On medium settings, we averaged around 45-55 FPS. The setup of the program was straightforward, and the ability to switch between macOS and a virtualized Windows with ease added to the appeal. The main limitation was the dependency on the Mac’s hardware, but for our M1 MacBook Air, Parallels proved to be a viable option for playing The Forest.
Our The Forest MacBook experience with Boot Camp
Using Boot Camp to run The Forest on an Intel-based MacBook Pro gave us the highest performance among the local methods. We achieved frame rates of up to 70 FPS on high settings, as Boot Camp allowed Windows to run natively on Mac hardware, thus fully utilized the machine’s capabilities. However, the downside was the partitioning of the drive and the need to reboot to switch between operating systems, which was less convenient than the virtualization which Parallels offered us.
Here’s a table summarizing the benchmarks and the settings we tested with each method:
|Boosteroid||MacBook Pro M1||50 Mbps||High||~60 FPS|
|GeForce Now||MacBook Pro M1||50 Mbps||High||~60 FPS|
|Parallels||MacBook Air M1||N/A||Medium||45-55 FPS|
|Boot Camp||MacBook Pro (Intel)||N/A||High||Up to 70 FPS|
What about playing The Forest on MacBook via Crossover?
We didn’t personally test the Crossover method with The Forest, but during our research, we found a reddit user who shared his experience with the game on a M1 MacBook Pro with 16GB of RAM. According to what he shared, he encountered a minor issue initially, with a black screen when starting a new world. Despite this, he could hear the audio and see the skip intro scene button and hunger icon at the bottom left, but the rest of the visuals were missing. To resolve this, he was advised to ensure he had DirectX for Modern Games and VXDH (Builtin) installed in the Steam bottle, and the bottle was set to Windows 10. After experimenting with different settings, including running the game in DX11 and configuring it, he shared that he eventually managed to get it up and running smoothly.
Ultimately, your choice among the methods that we shared will depend on your priorities, be it emphasizing performance, convenience, or a combination of both. In our experience with M1 Macs, Boosteroid and Parallels struck a balance between accessibility and gaming quality, while GeForce Now excelled in delivering quality gameplay, but with dependencies on internet speed and potential waiting times. On the other hand, for those with Intel-based Macs, Boot Camp remains a robust choice for top-notch local gaming performance, but it does require sacrificing some convenience.