Would you run Windows on an Intel Mac if it were possible?

Yes
53% (183 votes)
No
47% (163 votes)
Total votes: 346

Comments

To be able to just to do it, ok, but ...

Why lose the Aqua interface experience? Two dimensional Windows OS is so old.

KLH
New York City

Stay focused, go slow, keep it simple.

for playing games Windows

for playing games Windows might be fine but for productive work Mac is better
christo

No, but Apple could benefit and increase HW sales...

Although I do not think that I would personally do this, I think that there could be a big market for the Apple/Mac hardware with windows running as the OS.

I would run Mac OS X on my

I would run Mac OS X on my Thinkpad if it were possible. But Windows on a Mac? Never - why this?

Mac OS is the outstanding product of Apple, not Computers (exept these great quad core g5 powermacs maybe).

Yes, I'd dual boot

... if only to run SAS and AMOS. Right now I do almost everything on my powerbook, but I still need to keep a dell around to run these two applications.

And no, SPSS 11 just doesn't cut it.

I voted yes, but with reservations

I really need a Virtual PC-style app more often than I need to dual boot. I occasionally need to run a tool like Visual Studio, Access, or a windows-only stats package. I also need to qualify our web applications on windows browsers, which is much easier with a VPC-style tool, as the results can be compared in line.

The times I need to actually dual boot are quite rare. I might want to bring up ubuntu as a demo, or perhaps launch Windows to work with a client's network. For those rare times, dual booting helps.

DarWINE would also solve some of my problems - many stats packages do not need that many windows services.

Scott

Yes, We have an infrastructural need for Windows support

Personally, I would dual-boot to play games though that's exceedingly rare these days (time for playing games).

Realistically, It would be incredibly helpful for us to be able to run Windows on our Macs. We have an infrastructure that is built around Windows at an administrational level. This isn't uncommon. There are several core intranet applications that were deployed with only Windows support. Another good example is the recent Grants.gov Grant Viewer application. It currently only runs in Windows.

In a perfect world, we would be able to run Windows applications in windows, root-less, on our Intel Macs. I would like to see a real integration of something like Wine so that I could simply fire up a *.exe windows file and have it run right along side Safari. This would, of course, be non-trivial since we would not only need full Windows library support but we'd need some sort of Registry running. I'm sure, however, that Apple or Microsoft could enable this with a project that functioned similarly to the Tru-Blue OS 9 emulation layer in OS X. It wouldn't be a perfect solution but I'd much rather add an extra 512MB of RAM instead of running a Terminal Server or buying a seperate Windows PC so that research groups could run an occasional Windows binary on the Mac.

Steven.

I voted no, but with reservations

I support scientific applications and for some of those it would be helpful to have a virtualized or true dual-boot Windows environment. However, in reality I almost never boot my dual boot Linux/Windows PC into Windows, so the value of Windows on Intel Mac might be more perceived than real for me.

What I can definitely see for myself, though, is to make my Macbook Pro dual boot MacOSX/Linux.

Dual boot is not useful

No, I would not dual boot. I run a windows machine beside my Mac and flip the switch on the screen if I need the windows machine. I would run XP inside osx however. But dual boot is not very useful unless you only use one or the other OS. If you need to check how your web page works in IE on XP then you dont want to have to reboot your computer everytime and it makes much more sense to have XP running inside your OSX. Currently I use RDC or remote desktop connection from microsoft running inside OSX Tiger. Works great over 1Gig Ethernet and lets me run my XP machine in a window of my OSX operating system which I have found so much more superior to XP. Funny thing is that I thought I would need my XP machine for things (all those thousands of unavailable programs that MS tells us we will miss) after I bought my first mac last year and have yet to turn my XP machine on for much beyond a test here and there.

Well the answer for me is

Well the answer for me is less hypothetical now. I can and do run Windows on my Intel-based Mac. While I tinkered with a Bootcamp option, ultimately I found that Parallels (which runs a virtual machine) better served my interest--more convenient, and the speed hit really was remarkably low.

I currently use it to run QSR's Nvivo 7 software--a qualitative data analysis tool--and have been happy with the results. Since the Mac version of SPSS doesn't play well on Intel machines and (according to SPSS) produces errors under the Rosetta emulation, I'm also considering using a pc version of spss running under emulation.

SPSS on Intel Mac

I've been wondering about the viability of using SPSS for Windows on the Intel Macs. In fact, I'm waiting to make a purchase of a MacBook until I find out if it's possible to do so. I just can't wait until some time in 2007 when SPSS says they should have an intel compatible product for mac. Has anyone tried SPSS Windows on the new Macs? SPSS says that operating SPSS in Rosetta results in miscalculations. Does that apply to using Windows on the mac?

Parallels Trial

Hello everybody!
I am using Parallels, too. Perfect if you don´t wanna reboot all time.
I was surching a bit and found a trial version, only in German, but at least a free trial: http://shop.avanquest.com/de/trial.php?pid=2220
Enjoy it! :)